Let us
consider why the culture of land leasing is so prevalent in Indonesia—not to
take a side for or against it, but to understand the context. Research
indicates that land leasing flourishes in open areas where competition for
arable land is intense. There is a tendency to view sharecropping as a hallmark
of traditional agriculture, whereas leasing characterizes modern farming.
Sharecropping arrangements are often considered fairer, as the sharecropper
typically belongs to a lower socioeconomic class, whereas farmers who opt for
leasing generally come from a higher economic bracket. Thus, sharecropping
serves as a mechanism to realize the social value of land—a distinct contrast
to the leasing system.
My
research reveals that the relationship between the landowner and the lessee is
more impersonal, distant, and calculated. The fee (rent) is paid upfront, often
covering multiple seasons or years at once, ensuring the landowner incurs no
loss.
In
sharecropping, the cultivator usually comes from a lower economic stratum. In
leasing, however, the cultivator or lessee may belong to a higher economic
class, often possessing greater capital than the landowner. Unlike
sharecropping, leasing shifts greater authority to the lessee; effectively, the
lessee holds more power. Landowners sometimes feel fortunate simply because
someone is willing to lease their land for a substantial sum.
To put
it simply: this leasing relationship carries a distinct air of individualistic
capitalism. The question arises: is this the agricultural muamalah
(social-economic interaction) envisioned by Islam?
Therefore,
after examining the relevant Quranic verses and hadiths and comparing them with
current land-leasing practices—which tend to be exploitative—I believe we must
approach this with caution. I have yet to encounter a tenant farmer who is
truly happy with their situation. Yet, they are the voiceless—people who not
only do not know where to turn for redress but have also likely never heard a
religious sermon explaining how deeply the Prophet cared about the plight of
tenants like them.
The
expansion of land leasing in Indonesia is also closely related to broader
structural changes in the rural economy. Population growth, land fragmentation
through inheritance, rising land values, urban expansion, and the
commercialization of agriculture have all contributed to a situation in which
access to land increasingly depends on financial capacity rather than social
relations. At the same time, advances in agricultural technology, the growing
importance of market-oriented production, and the emergence of entrepreneurial
farmers have encouraged the concentration of operational control over larger
areas of land. Under such circumstances, leasing becomes an efficient mechanism
for consolidating fragmented plots into economically viable farming units.
However, this efficiency often comes at the cost of weakening traditional norms
of reciprocity, mutual assistance, and community solidarity that historically
characterized agrarian relations in many Indonesian villages.
Furthermore,
the widespread adoption of leasing reflects unequal bargaining positions within
rural society. Many landowners lease out their land because they are elderly,
have migrated to urban areas, lack labor, or no longer wish to engage directly
in farming. On the other hand, tenant farmers frequently accept high rental
costs because they have limited alternatives for accessing land. This creates a
situation in which agricultural risks—such as crop failure, pest outbreaks,
market fluctuations, or extreme weather events—are disproportionately borne by
the cultivator. The moral concern from an Islamic perspective is therefore not
merely the legality of the contract itself, but whether the arrangement
protects the dignity, livelihood, and welfare of those whose labor sustains
agricultural production. Any agrarian system that systematically transfers risk
downward while concentrating security and returns upward deserves careful
scrutiny in light of Islam’s enduring concern for justice, compassion, and the
protection of vulnerable groups.
*****
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar